[Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Sugar on Fedora looking forward

Chihurumnaya Ibiam ibiamchihurumnaya at gmail.com
Wed Jul 11 09:18:42 EDT 2018

Hi Peter,

1) Clock and Record have been ported to gst1.0

2) There are quite a number of activities that have/are being ported to
gtk3 and more will follow.

4) There's an ongoing port of the sugar gtk3 toolkit to python3 and it'll
get to other parts of sugar soon.

I'd love to assist, but that'll be once i get Fedora up and running.


Ibiam Chihurumnaya <ibiamchihurumnaya at gmail.com>

On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 9:35 AM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com>

> Hello All,
> This is intended to ask questions and seek feedback.
> I've not really had time to deal with Sugar for some time, but it also
> doesn't tend to take up a lot of time so it's not been a major
> problem, we glue it together when it breaks etc.
> Kalpa has done a good job keeping most of the Activities up to date.
> But there's a number of things that are getting to the point where
> they'll need action or they'll break so I'd like to gather details
> from the Sugar community what their plans are here to see if it's
> worthwhile continuing the Fedora support of Sugar.
> 1) gstreamer 1.0 support in Activies. The 0.10 series is well and
> truly dead and unmaintained, but there's a couple of key Activities
> that still depend on it. Clock and Record are the two big ones here.
> Are there any plans to move them to gst1?
> 2) GTK2 sugar-toolkit, again a number of Activities still haven't
> moved to gtk3, any plans?
> 3) eToys, we've not shipped this by default for some time, I plan on
> retiring it and any of it's dependencies in Fedora 29. Good riddance
> sugar-presence-service!
> 4) This is the big one... python2. With python2 being EOL real soon
> now is there any interest in moving to py3, I know there was some work
> years ago to do some readiness here with the move to gtk3 but I don't
> remember the details. Fedora is actively moving to python3 and has
> been for some years, I think for at least 6 releases it's been
> possible to run without py2 installed at all. Is this the nail in the
> coffin for Sugar?
> Also with my note above about time and the points in between are there
> still people interested in Sugar on Fedora? Anyone interested enough
> to assist?
> Peter
> _______________________________________________
> SoaS mailing list
> SoaS at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/soas
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20180711/5c5d2172/attachment.html>

More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list