[Sugar-devel] Python is good - don't waste time (was Re: The future of Sugar on XO-1s)
tony_anderson at usa.net
Wed Apr 6 20:49:30 EDT 2016
Our need is a deployable device - one that can be purchased in
quantities of 30+.
If we develop a technique to install Sugar on such a device, that can be
done for all of them at
the time of deployment. So, if anyone can find a suitable tablet with a
manageable price (less than $100)
and can install Sugar on it from a usb drive - it would be a boon.
Sora Edwards-Thro is planning a deployment with the $50 Kindle Fire (an
Android derivative). Her intent
is to use Sugarizer. I would recommend adding the GCompris Android
version. What she really needs is
a Sugarized version of the WriteBook activity. So far, no one has
stepped up to take that on. Naturally, the strategic
interest is how well the Kindle supports learning.
On 04/06/2016 10:03 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> Hey Jonas
> A nice surprise to see you here :)
> On 6 April 2016 at 09:29, Jonas Smedegaard <dr at jones.dk
> <mailto:dr at jones.dk>> wrote:
> Quoting Dave Crossland (2016-04-06 14:42:57)
> > On 6 April 2016 at 02:59, <sam at sam.today> wrote:
> >> You can install GNU on a chromebook, you can install GNU on
> >> you can install GNU on some tablets. Those are the pedagogic
> >> of now and the future. Those run faster with Gtk than with WebKit.
> > Will devices running GNU and Sugar desktops get into the hands
> of most
> > of the world's poor children in the next 10 years?
> Devices *not* running GNU (and therefore Sugar desktop) are likely
> devices not in the control of its owner.
> Underlying question is therefore if it matters that the device "in the
> hands" of those kids is in their own control or not.
> Only if it does not matter is it relevant to consider throwing
> away the
> work done developing Sugar-atop-a-POSIX-system and instead invest only
> in developing Sugar-atop-a-web-browser.
> It would be nice if the devices came with GNU preinstalled. Sure! :)
> But, they won't.
> So, how will GNU get on them?
> If the owners learn to love computers, as you and I love computers,
> then they will care to assert control and run GNU.
> That is, afterall, how we first came to be running GNU. Not sure about
> you old boy, but I was 16 when I installed my first distro. The
> learning experience changed my life.
> Sugarizer presents a viable way to help them learn to love computers
> with the computers they have.
> GNU/Sugar is the platform kids deserves, but not the one they need
> right now.
> The way I see it, the OLPC strategy of shipping devices with GNU on
> them isn't reaching most kids.
> Sugar Labs first press release stated an intention to court other
> hardware vendors. AFAIK there were and are none, and if Sugar Labs got
> into selling hardware it still wouldn't matter, and would just compete
> with what is left of OLPC. The Infinity laptop being built in
> Australia is great, all power to them, but it shouldn't be the leading
> The SOAS strategy of booting devices into GNU, and offering Activities
> from ASLO, also fails to reach most kids, cause in MOST cases their
> devices can't boot SOAS anyway. And as I said the other day, the cold
> hard fact is that ASLO traffic is down 90% over the last 3 years.
> So look, don't get me wrong. For this year, and the next year, and the
> next year, the way Sugarizer Activities are integrated into GNU/Sugar
> is GREAT. I am NOT advocating that we "throw out the great
> technologies we have now," and I'm sorry if I was unclear in my
> admittedly provocative thinkpiece; that is simply not how Sugar +
> Sugarizer works today, so its nothing to be worried about :)
> What I _am_ advocating for is a vision, a mission, and a strategy for
> what Sugar Labs will do over the next 1, 3, 5, 10 years with the mission.
> As clear as I can distill it, it is this:
> Sugar is high quality software for children to learn with,
> especially younger children.
> If we don't meet kids where they are at, we will not convert as many
> of them into computer lovers as we could. Focusing on the development
> of GNU/Sugar as the primary platform for the next 10 years is not
> meeting kids where they are at. Dropping development of GNU/Sugar
> would be immoral, given 100,000s of kids using it daily. But to get to
> 1,000,000,000 kids, it can not be the primary focus.
> Only web based software can reach a billion kids.
> So Sugar has to become high quality web based software for children to
> learn with.
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Sugar-devel