[Sugar-devel] changes in trac and others

Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-reply-to-2010-3 at silbe.org
Fri Oct 8 04:55:40 EDT 2010

Excerpts from Tomeu Vizoso's message of Fri Oct 08 10:01:37 +0200 2010:

> >> The SEETA Developer: field might better be adjusted to Developer:, and we
> >> could use a convention to tag the developer's name, such as, [SEETA] Ishan
> >
> > What would be the difference between Owner and Developer then?
> My guess is that Seeta wants to track which of their developers may
> work in a particular issue in the future, without actually taking
> ownership of the issue. I interpret being the owner as "I'm working on
> this right now, so if you start working on it we may end up doing
> duplicated work".

That's how I interpret it as well. But then a single Developer field
(which would supposedly only take a single value) wouldn't work as
other organisations might want to "assign" one of their developers.

> In any case, I think Seeta needs to explain what their intention was
> with this change, and the other organizations that are as well putting
> people to work on Sugar tickets are also welcome to do the same.

+1 on both counts


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20101008/67d96f12/attachment.pgp>

More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list