[Sugar-devel] Activity Versioning - Dotted Scheme

Simon Schampijer simon at schampijer.de
Tue Nov 24 08:24:33 EST 2009

On 11/24/2009 02:12 PM, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 12:20:15PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>> Hi,
>> as a follow up on an older thread:
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2009-October/019939.html
>> - we want to get the versioning sorted in 0.88 for real. So far we came
>> up with these three options:
>> a) The release cycle dependent one: Activities name their activity after
>> the Sugar version they are developed against. If it was released during
>> the 0.88 cycle and developed against 0.88, then it would be 0.88.x.
> Most of activities are compatible with several release cycles, so using
> SP in activity versions adds only confusing

Yup, agreed.


More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list