[Sugar-devel] Activity Versioning - Dotted Scheme
alsroot at member.fsf.org
Tue Nov 24 08:12:25 EST 2009
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 12:20:15PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> as a follow up on an older thread:
> - we want to get the versioning sorted in 0.88 for real. So far we came
> up with these three options:
> a) The release cycle dependent one: Activities name their activity after
> the Sugar version they are developed against. If it was released during
> the 0.88 cycle and developed against 0.88, then it would be 0.88.x.
Most of activities are compatible with several release cycles, so using
SP in activity versions adds only confusing
> b) MAJOR.MINOR (x.y): The new Browse activity for 0.88 would be 115.0.
> Fixes would go into 115.1, 115.2...
> c) MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH (x.y.z) The new Browse activity for 0.88 would be
> 115.0.0. Fixes would go into 115.1.0, 115.2.1...
> What do people like best?
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
More information about the Sugar-devel