[sugar] Re: Studly caps

Marco Pesenti Gritti mpg
Thu Jul 20 08:58:43 EDT 2006

Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> Hi,
> the presence service is now using studly caps in package names and in 
> signal names. We should really have a convention about this...
> There are a few of things I don't like that much about using studly 
> caps there:
> - Using studly caps only for class names was giving some clue of what 
> was a class and what a package.
> - The gtk/glib convention for signals is to use - instead and since we 
> are using those heavily we would have to mix styles.
> - What should we do for single word package/signals? I guess they 
> should use caps too but... it's sort of ugly.
> I don't have such a strong feeling about the specific convention... 
> but we should really make our conventions clear and use them 
> consistently.
The same for methods...


More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list