[IAEP] Sugar Labs 2017 Budget

[Laura Vargas]

2017-02-25 20:33 GMT-05:00 Tymon Radzik <dwgipk at gmail.com>:
>
> Our funds deserve to be spent in more orgnization-beneficial way.
>
>
Hello Tymon,

Sorry it took me a while to reply.

This Budget discussion is an open door for proposals, please do share yours
as this policy making is also an educational process and therefore an ideal
arena for learning!


Open Badges are proposed as an award for historic achievements, there is no
conflict of interest when you have numeric results that support your
performance.

I think this discussion leads to the question of what would make a Sugar
Labs member an *active contributo*r? and of course, would rewarding active
contributors stimulate regular members to become active contributors?

Those are valid questions that should and can be easily tested with for
example the implementation Open Badges.

I would say at least one of the following must happen for a given period of
time for a regular member to be considered an active contributor:

1- The member contributed periodically to at least one of the Sugar Labs
Teams.

2- The member has had active leaderships of at least one of the Sugar Labs
Projects.

3- The member directly contributed with code and/or with Sugar Projects
translations.


All this data is available from logs, wiki, mailing list, etc. I hope for
the future of the community and it's users, the recognition of active
contributors becomes soon an open strategy for Sugar Labs evolution.

:D

Regards,

-- 
Laura V.
* I&D SomosAZUCAR.Org*

“No paradox, no progress.”
~ Niels Bohr

Happy Learning!


> Best,
> Tymon
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/attachments/20170301/d1e5a5c3/attachment.html>