[IAEP] Sugar Labs 2017 Budget

[Dave Crossland]

Thanks for clarifying :)

The question remains then: Is Sugar Labs to direct attention entirely to a
few hundreds of very-to-somewhat old XO laptops maintained by experts like
Tony and those in Caacupe, or to the millions of children who have
computers/tablets capable of accessing/installing Sugarizer, or to some mix
of the two; and if the latter, what mix is appropriate in 2017 and 2018?

On 1 March 2017 at 05:26, Tony Anderson <tony_anderson at usa.net> wrote:

> All models are obviously xo-1, xo-1.5, xo-1.75 and xo-4. Sugarizer is not
> relevant since the XOs deploy Sugar. The Sugarizer activities are mostly
> also available as Sugar web activities. We are using the Python Turtle
> blocks.
>
> Tony
>
>
> On 02/28/2017 02:29 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>
>
>
> On Feb 27, 2017 11:34 PM, "Tony Anderson" <tony_anderson at usa.net> wrote:
>
> For what it's worth, Sugar 0.110 (OLPC OS 13.2.8) has been installed on
> hundreds of XO laptops, all models in Rwanda. The codebase is reaching
> these classrooms.
>
>
> That is great to know!!! :)
>
> What xo models are those?
>
> Does anyone know of any other classrooms using the latest release?
>
> I am not sure what you mean by the js codebase, but if you mean the sugar
> web activities. Yes they are available for optional installment (along with
> the other activities in ASLO)
>
>
> Sugarizer
>
>
>


-- 
Cheers
Dave
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/attachments/20170301/ad370160/attachment.html>