No subject

   XO imo needs to ship with multiple languages ...
   whereas LOGO may not be "a suitable alternative for a general-purpose language",
   it is hyper suitable as a language for XO end users "as a learning tool" ~~
   as Ken Iverson might call it "as a tool for thought".

   I strongly belief that XO must ship with multiple small footprint language
   tools for thought and that those tools need to include J, LOGO, LISP, and Forth.

    ... one can also request from the IAEP community "enhancements and extensions"
   that make sense ... does LOGO need to be able to work with a camera image ...
   in general terms, no ...  would the XO benefit from an API that allows
   extensions for J, LOGO, LISP, Forth, Python, and whatever ... that would be good.

   Look at Microsoft's .NET Framework ... while it has c# and vb as its foundation
   languages, it can accommodate many languages and they can all interoperate.

   In that I do not have a XO and even if I did, at the present, my time is too limited,
   I have taken the opportunity to add my own thoughts to this thread.

   I am no Alan Kay.  I am no Ken Iverson.  OTOH, I have been
   programming for 40+ years and have taught programming up
   to the community college level as well as to young people ... thus,
   I have no doubt that I can offer the occasional useful suggestions and insights.
 ----

Frequently I quote:  If your only tool is a happy, all of your problems tend to look like nails.

Please ship the XO with the tools mentioned above so that XO end users
and educators who create learning materials for the XO can have their
choice of "tools for thought".

Gerry
__________________________________
Gerry Lowry, Principal
Ability Business Computer Services  ~~ Because it's your Business, our Experience Counts!
68 John W. Taylor Avenue
Alliston · Ontario · Canada · L9R 0E1 · 705.250.0112
gerry.lowry at abilitybusinesscomputerservices.com          http://abilitybusinesscomputerservices.com