[IAEP] Sugar Lab Meeting

Walter Bender walter.bender at gmail.com
Tue Jul 15 03:54:10 CEST 2008

I've been slow in getting things moving because I have (perhaps
mistakenly) been trying to get all the organizational things sorted
out first. I like you suggestion that the oversight board start
meeting regularly (even though we haven't any official status yet).
Thursday after the Sugar Developers meeting?


On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 9:15 PM, David Farning <dfarning at sugarlabs.org> wrote:
> This week Simon opined on the status of Sugar meetings.
>> I think that our dev meetings have not been accepted as much as i have
>> hoped they
>> would have been. With accepted I mean for example that people don't
>> suggest topics
>> themselves. Maybe this was not the right approach and we have to set
>> the topics our
>> self (at least for now).
> It would be good to get Mako's input on this.  If my memory does not
> fail me, he ran some effective meetings at Ubuntu.
>> I just wonder what I really expect from the meetings. (points don't
>> have to be
>> exclusive)
>> a) an update what happened this week, who is working on what (in
>> development,
>> process change)
>> b) discussion of new features
>> c) bug triage - give out little tasks to people(opportunity/sugar
>> love)
>> d) introduce new people
>> e) people ask questions - like activity developers
>> f) maybe this is not developers only and we start to discuss education
>> topics,
>> deployments as well
> It seems time to split the sugar meeting into developers and Sugar Labs.
> Would this be a good time to start booting up the Oversight board?
> Maybe a Weekly Sugar Labs meeting with the Oversight board taking part
> once per month.
> dfarning
> _______________________________________________
> Its.an.education.project mailing list
> Its.an.education.project at lists.lo-res.org
> http://lists.lo-res.org/mailman/listinfo/its.an.education.project

More information about the Its.an.education.project mailing list