[IAEP] Sugar Lab Meeting

[David Farning]

This week Simon opined on the status of Sugar meetings.

> I think that our dev meetings have not been accepted as much as i have
> hoped they 
> would have been. With accepted I mean for example that people don't
> suggest topics 
> themselves. Maybe this was not the right approach and we have to set
> the topics our 
> self (at least for now).

It would be good to get Mako's input on this.  If my memory does not
fail me, he ran some effective meetings at Ubuntu.

> I just wonder what I really expect from the meetings. (points don't
> have to be 
> exclusive)
> 
> a) an update what happened this week, who is working on what (in
> development, 
> process change)
> b) discussion of new features
> c) bug triage - give out little tasks to people(opportunity/sugar
> love)
> d) introduce new people
> e) people ask questions - like activity developers
> f) maybe this is not developers only and we start to discuss education
> topics, 
> deployments as well

It seems time to split the sugar meeting into developers and Sugar Labs.
Would this be a good time to start booting up the Oversight board?

Maybe a Weekly Sugar Labs meeting with the Oversight board taking part
once per month.

dfarning