[sugar] (another) WebKit port of Browse
Mon Jul 7 18:20:39 EDT 2008
Why does automatic authentication require a custom browser? Client
certificates work well for this function in ordinary web applications
(assuming a properly configured server).
As to collaborative browsing, that use case should be balanced against all
the available applications that having a standard Firefox enables
painlessly. Where is a user story of collaborative browsing (as contrasted
to a shared bookmark repository) documented?
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 3:10 PM, Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff at gmail.com>
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:56 PM, C. Scott Ananian <cscott at laptop.org>
> > I'd rather see us just give up on Browse and ship and appropriately
> > configured Firefox. I just can't see OLPC devoting enough developer
> Not so fast! The XS deliverables need a custom browser on the XO for
> reasons we were discussing last Thursday :-)
> If we want
> - automagic authentication with the XS
> - collaborative browsing (which can get better than what we have)
> we need a custom, bespoke, forked, evil, lasers-on-sharkies-heads
> browser. Call it Betty if you want, but we need it.
> martin.langhoff at gmail.com
> martin at laptop.org -- School Server Architect
> - ask interesting questions
> - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first
> - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
> Devel mailing list
> Devel at lists.laptop.org
Frisbeetarianism is the belief that when you die, your soul goes up on the
roof and gets stuck -- George Carlin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Sugar-devel