[Systems] sugarlabs.net transfer initiated.

Stefan Unterhauser stefan at unterhauser.name
Wed Aug 8 16:31:48 EDT 2012

thanks cjl,

my main point is that in gandi owner and admin
are nearly equal in their rights ...
... they both can manage who will be Bill-C and Tech-C

so for now I would just set SFC to be owner and Bernie to admin
so they both can change bill-c and tech-c ;)


On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Chris Leonard <cjlhomeaddress at gmail.com> wrote:
> It is a little hard to follow the embedded threads of the message, but
> I think I can say with relative safety that the general consensus of
> the SLOBS is that whatever works for both Bernie and Bradley works for
> the SLOBs.
> Having at least two registered points of contact (Bernie and Bradley)
> is essential, if I read the threads correctly the proposal is to have
> Stephan Unterhauser (dogi) as the Technical Contact to add even more
> contact redundancy, which makes sense to me and if it is how Bernie
> and Bradley agree to handle it, I am not going to second-guess that
> choice.
> cjl
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Stefan Unterhauser
> <stefan at unterhauser.name> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Bradley M. Kuhn
>> <bkuhn at sfconservancy.org> wrote:
>>> Stefan, you wrote this private to me.  I'll need the SLOBs to agree to
>>> your proposal below, so you'll need to propose it to them to.
>> ups :P thank you
>>> Stefan Unterhauser wrote at 11:31 (EDT) on Tuesday:
>>>> Sorry technical contact has not access to all the features ... only to
>>>> most ;)
>>> Which ones doesn't the Admin Contact have access to?
>>>> there are 4 rules in gandi
>>>> http://wiki.gandi.net/en/domains/management/rights/admc
>>> Looking at that, I don't see what specifically the Sugar Labs System
>>> teams would need to do?  The Admin contact stuff appears to be about
>>> autorenewal, and the like.  What am I missing?
>> managing accounts ;) for example
>> and other features which are not listed ...
>> ... at least admin is designed to be the 2nd in charge
>>>> that s why I would structure it like this:
>>>> owner: SFC
>>>> Admin: Bernie
>>>> Billing: Bradley
>>>> Tech: somebody else (SU14-gandi is mine, but I think we have more
>>>> gandi handles in sugarlabs )
>>> As mentioned in previous (public) email, I suggest the tech contact be a
>>> role account.
>> yes I am for that too ...
>> ... but as of now just make bernie admin so we can setup that later ;)
>> -> this is at least my suggestion
>>> --
>>> Bradley M. Kuhn, Executive Director, Software Freedom Conservancy
>> _______________________________________________
>> Systems mailing list
>> Systems at lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/systems

More information about the Systems mailing list