[Systems] kernel on buildslave1 too old for svn

[Bernie Innocenti]

On 04/02/09 13:41, Sascha Silbe wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> I've just been told by Fedora [1] that the kernel currently running on
> buildslave1 is too old and causing our inability to use svn (!) on that
> machine.
> Bernie, have you heard anything from prgmr yet?

Some time ago they told me there was not enough capacity on their XEN
3.3 machines to move all our images.

The situation might have changed now.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [rt.prgmr.com #311] sugarlabs1 routing problem
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 04:49:23 -0800
From: Nick Schmalenberger via RT <support at rt.prgmr.com>
Reply-To: support at rt.prgmr.com
To: bernie at codewiz.org

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:36:28AM -0800, bernie at codewiz.org via RT wrote:
>
> Mon Feb 23 11:36:27 2009: Request 311 was acted upon.
> Transaction: Ticket created by bernie at codewiz.org
>        Queue: Customer Support
>      Subject: sugarlabs1 routing problem
>        Owner: Nobody
>   Requestors: bernie at codewiz.org
>       Status: new
>  Ticket <URL: http://rt.prgmr.com/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=311 >
>
>
> Ciao,
>
> there seems to be a routing problem with sugarlabs1:
>
> bernie at giskard:~$ ping sugarlabs1.xen.prgmr.com
> PING sugarlabs1.xen.prgmr.com (216.218.223.88) 56(84) bytes of data.
> From 64.62.133.65 icmp_seq=1 Time to live exceeded
> From 64.62.133.65 icmp_seq=2 Time to live exceeded
> From 64.62.133.65 icmp_seq=3 Time to live exceeded
>
The routing loop can occur if the default gateway is set to the
gateway of one of the other subnets on the same ethernet. The
gateway for your subnet is 216.218.223.65.
> BTW, can we move the remaining machines to stables?
>
There might be capacity for one other but not all. So is the
performance on stables similar to boar now that you have more
ram and cpu_weight than before, and another cpu? Thanks.
Nick Schmalenberger


-- 
   // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
 \X/  Sugar Labs       - http://www.sugarlabs.org/