[Sugar-devel] Proposal for Flatpak port project

[Martin Abente]

Hi !

Thanks for sharing your proposal, I have read through it.

My recommendation is that you reconsider the activities you selected.
Especially those that require ports to Python 3 and GTK 3.

The reason is simple; porting these activities to Python 3 and GTK 3 is a
whole project in itself. Note that porting activities to Python 3 and GTK 3
requires more than just writing the code, e.g., testing, reviews, releases,
etc. That would take a significantly longer time (than a week, as per the
proposal) for a large activity such as TamTam.

Plus, you have to account for the time required to port these to Flatpak.

So, try to find activities that are already ported to Python 3 and GTK 3
and then analyze the project complexity to come up with a schedule that
would fit in the GSoC duration.

Regards,
Martín.

On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 5:26 PM Tech Shubham <shubhamtiwari71488 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi everyone,
> I am attaching here my draft proposal for maintaining and porting Flatpak
> activities. Before finalizing it, I want to know your opinion on the
> selection of activities I've chosen to port. Please take a moment to review
> the proposal and share your thoughts.
> Thank you for your time and input.
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20240328/014dbed3/attachment.htm>