[Sugar-devel] Porting sugar activity to sugarizer

[Abhishek Tanwar]

Working on it. Thanks for the feedback.

On Fri, 13 Mar, 2020, 1:56 AM James Cameron, <quozl at laptop.org> wrote:

> Sorry, no, I can't.  I don't understand it fully myself, and I've a
> lack of time.  My focus is on the reverse; to bring Sugarizer
> activities back into Sugar.
>
> In general, you should spend the time to decompose and document the
> algorithm using your own understanding of Python source code.  The
> documentation you make may not be needed by anyone else other than
> you, but if you do publish it then I'd like to host it in the Implode
> repository for future use in diagnosing any problems.
>
> In terms of sizing this effort, I'd expect a programmer to be able to
> reverse engineer Python code at a rate of between one and ten lines of
> code a minute, depending on the breadth of their experience.  If
> you're not up to that, then either find someone else to do it
> (i.e. not me), or take some other task.
>
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 06:07:45PM +0530, Abhishek Tanwar wrote:
> > I have been trying to understand the game but it is quite tough .If you
> could
> > provide me with some logic,algorithm and references used ,it would be
> helpful
> > to understand the code.
> > Thank You
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 9:07 AM James Cameron <[1]quozl at laptop.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >     The board is not random in the beginning.
> >
> >     When creating a game to play Implode starts with an empty board state
> >     and injects transformations to confuse that state.  The type of
> >     transformations are the exact inverse of those the player requests in
> >     a winning move sequence.
> >
> >     The code is in boardgen.py
> >
> >     The Maze game has a reversible algorithm too.
> >
> >     On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 08:55:49AM +0530, Abhishek Tanwar wrote:
> >     > I am porting Implode activity to sugarizer . I read the code a few
> times
> >     and I
> >     > partially understood its working . One thing that I am not able to
> >     understand
> >     > is the logic that the game always have an answer despite of random
> board
> >     > formation in the beginning .
> >     > Is it that the initial state of board is designed according to
> last state
> >     and
> >     > the game is played in a reverse order such that there exist no
> state in
> >     which
> >     > there is no next move to make?
> >     >
> >
> >     > _______________________________________________
> >     > Sugar-devel mailing list
> >     > [2]Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> >     > [3]http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> >
> >     --
> >     James Cameron
> >     [4]http://quozl.netrek.org/
> >
> > References:
> >
> > [1] mailto:quozl at laptop.org
> > [2] mailto:Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> > [3] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> > [4] http://quozl.netrek.org/
>
> --
> James Cameron
> http://quozl.netrek.org/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20200313/0df13f45/attachment.htm>