[Sugar-devel] Request for Comments: What's missing for a Sugar 1.0 release?

[Dave Crossland]

I'm curious how often those XO machines are updated to the latest release
of Sugar.

Does anyone have any estimates for how many machines are in active use and
how many are really upgraded?

On Mon, May 20, 2019, 3:18 AM Tony Anderson <tony_anderson at usa.net> wrote:

> Sugar Labs are the only people on the planet who believe 0.114 > 0.98. The
> primary requirement is that it works on all models of the XO (still by far
> the dominant platform for Sugar). It should be documented by an update to
> Documentation 0.106.
>
> Tony
>
>
> On 5/20/19 6:36 AM, Alex Perez wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> Six years and ~two months ago, way back in March of 2013, the then-current
> SLOBs decided to make "the next release" version 1.0. This didn't happen,
> and instead, 0.99.0 was released on 2013-06-27 instead.
>
> See
> https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2013-03-21
>
> I'd like to request that the community at-large share their opinions with
> regards to what they feel are _must-have_ (not "nice to have") items for a
> "Sugar 1.0" release. Please reply to this thread with your thoughts.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing listSugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.orghttp://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20190520/e6c87a7a/attachment.html>