[Sugar-devel] Request for Comments: What's missing for a Sugar 1.0 release?

[Tony Anderson]

Naturally I can only speak of the locations where I am supporting laptop 
deploymens: Rwanda and Pakistan. In Rwanda there are nearly 400,000 
laptops deployed at approcimately 1600 primary schools. These are a mix 
of XO-1, XO-1.5 and XO-1.75. Most of the XO-1.5s unfortunately have only 
2GB storage. In Pakistan, there are approximately 1000 XO-1 and XO-1.5s 
deployed. The XO-1.5s have been configured with 16GB storage. The number 
deployed  will grow in 2019 due to the transfer of XO-4 laptops from 
Australia. These are configured with 8GB storage.

All of these laptops have been updated, most to 13.2.9. Some were 
upgraded to 13.2.8 and have not yet been updated to 13.2.9.  This is the 
latest ugly release, an essential requirement for flash, mp3 and mp4 
instructional materials.

Tony

On 5/20/19 3:52 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> I'm curious how often those XO machines are updated to the latest 
> release of Sugar.
>
> Does anyone have any estimates for how many machines are in active use 
> and how many are really upgraded?
>
> On Mon, May 20, 2019, 3:18 AM Tony Anderson <tony_anderson at usa.net 
> <mailto:tony_anderson at usa.net>> wrote:
>
>     Sugar Labs are the only people on the planet who believe 0.114 >
>     0.98. The primary requirement is that it works on all models of
>     the XO (still by far the dominant platform for Sugar). It should
>     be documented by an update to Documentation 0.106.
>
>     Tony
>
>
>     On 5/20/19 6:36 AM, Alex Perez wrote:
>>     Folks,
>>
>>     Six years and ~two months ago, way back in March of 2013, the
>>     then-current SLOBs decided to make "the next release" version
>>     1.0. This didn't happen, and instead, 0.99.0 was released on
>>     2013-06-27 instead.
>>
>>     Seehttps://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2013-03-21
>>
>>     I'd like to request that the community at-large share their
>>     opinions with regards to what they feel are _must-have_ (not
>>     "nice to have") items for a "Sugar 1.0" release. Please reply to
>>     this thread with your thoughts.
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Sugar-devel mailing list
>>     Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org  <mailto:Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org>
>>     http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Sugar-devel mailing list
>     Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>     <mailto:Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org>
>     http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20190520/31ff0ca5/attachment.html>