[Sugar-devel] Request to review GSoC Proposal

[Yash Agrawal]

Iteration 1 of GSoC :
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SLCS5CLv_j1yjnk6RuIS7gdOKxJ2XvNUqzbMR0Zxn7U/edit#

Hello Carlos,

Thanks for your review. I have already tested every activity I mentioned on
the list. I have added a buffer week to release to all activities which
were not released because of testing delay or any hard bug to solve. I am
also flexible with the timeline I proposed, any changes can be made after
discussion with mentors. Without actually diving deep into their code, it
will be very hard to know if any difficult issue will arise. If this case
arises, I am willing to work extra hours to keep up with the timeline.

Hello James,

I have tried to make every change you suggested. Please review.

Anyone

‌

On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 3:40 AM, James Cameron <quozl at laptop.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 10:26:48PM +0530, Yash Agrawal wrote:
> > I have completed the first draft of my GSoC Proposal. Please review
> > and give your suggestions. Any suggestion/request for an activity to
> > port is also welcomed.
>
> Your work so far on porting activities to GTK+ 3 has been very good,
> so I don't expect any significant problems that can't be solved by
> asking questions or more coding.
>
> I've reviewed and have some comments;
>
> - where the proposal template asks "please send us URLs", and "some
>   other demonstration of your work", you might add your GitHub profile
>   URL and some of the pull requests you've worked on recently.  You do
>   mention these much later, but it is good to answer the question.
>
>   (because although some of us know what you've been doing, the Google
>   Open Source team won't know this until you tell them).
>
> - use terms consistently and correctly, and avoid unnecessary
>   abbreviations; e.g. "pull request" instead of "PR", "Sugar" instead
>   of "sugar", "Sugar Toolkit" instead of {sugar-toolkit,
>   sugar-toolkit-gtk3}, "Ubuntu" instead of "ubuntu", "Fedora" instead
>   of "fedora", "GTK+ 2" instead of {GTK2, GTK+ 2.x, Gtk, Gtk+},
>   "GStreamer" instead of "GST", and (perhaps) "PyGObject API" instead
>   of "PyGI",
>
>   (because the inconsistent use within the document, and against
>   external references, makes it harder to read).
>
> - in your list of activities, use the value for name from
>   activity.info rather than the GitHub repository name,
>
>   (because this is the name by which the activity is best known to
>   other people,)
>
> - the activity Labyrinth has a GTK+ 3 port already, and there are
>   several repositories that are not proper clones or forks.  See my
>   audit in https://github.com/sugarlabs/laybrinth-activity/issues/1
>
> - you might plan how to encourage testing of your work by Sugar Labs
>   community,
>
> - you might mention how your work will be affected by or benefit from
>   the Port to Python 3 project,
>
> --
> James Cameron
> http://quozl.netrek.org/
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20180323/35ab9361/attachment-0001.html>