[Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Re: PR comments on 'Save as
tony_anderson at usa.net
Mon Jul 11 11:18:00 EDT 2016
It seems to be nostalgia week. The goal is to have the user supply a
name. Whether the text says untitled, Write.activity, execrable, or is
left blank. The user will not be able to save until a title is supplied.
There would be literally no 'untitled' or 'Write.activity' documents in
On 07/11/2016 04:56 PM, Martin Dengler wrote:
> On 11 Jul 2016, at 15:44, Dave Crossland <dave at lab6.com
> <mailto:dave at lab6.com>> wrote:
>> On 11 July 2016 at 10:40, Tony Anderson <tony_anderson at usa.net
>> <mailto:tony_anderson at usa.net>> wrote:
>> I prefer 'Untitled' as it supports the intent of the alert - to
>> request the user to supply a title.
>> I also prefer Untitled, although I'm curious to hear why "xxx
>> Activity" would be better.
> Actually, 500 "Untitled"s are so much worse than 5 sets of 100
> "Foo.activity", because (in my limited experience) kids who can read
> know that "Speak activity" is different than "Write activity".
> There are literally over a hundred emails about this design decision
> years back - it was not done lightly. I didn't even participate and I
> was exhausted by the debate.
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Sugar-devel