[Sugar-devel] Programming in Python or as a Web Activity ?

[laurent bernabe]

Fixed !!!

In fact I should have left the last line in loader.js (something like
require(SUGAR_LIB))

Regards

2014/1/24 laurent bernabe <laurent.bernabe at gmail.com>

> Thank you very much.
>
> I've tried to modify what needed to be modified in my LearnChess project (
> https://git.sugarlabs.org/learnchess/learnchess_web), but it seem that I
> missed something. (Too hurry to get started with CreateJS :=D, sorry).
>
> Regards
>
>
> 2014/1/24 Manuel Quiñones <manuq at laptop.org>
>
>> 2014/1/24 laurent bernabe <laurent.bernabe at gmail.com>
>> >
>> > Thank you,
>> >
>> > The most challenging task that I am facing in my development beginning,
>> is to get the libraries easel.js and tween.js work as shim dependencies of
>> require.js. In fact, I think I could read require.js documentation
>> thousands of times, I won't be able to get started.
>>
>> I have created a bootstrap activity for you:
>> https://github.com/manuq/createjs-activity-bootstrap
>>
>> The bad thing with CreateJS is that they don't support AMD yet.  But see
>>
>> https://github.com/CreateJS/EaselJS/wiki/Using-easeljs-and-tweenjs-with-requirejs
>> .
>>  What worked for me:
>>
>> ./osbuild shell
>> volo create my-game ./sugar-web-template
>> cd my-game/lib
>> wget http://code.createjs.com/easeljs-0.7.1.min.js
>> mv easeljs-0.7.1.min.js easeljs.js
>> wget http://code.createjs.com/tweenjs-0.5.1.min.js
>> mv tweenjs-0.5.1.min.js tweenjs.js
>>
>> And see the changes I did:
>>
>> https://github.com/manuq/createjs-activity-bootstrap/commit/79f4e4ed730c71cf42bfa0419f109718fb598fcb
>>
>> > The other problem, is that I need to put a real canvas element inside
>> the <div id="canvas"> ... but I don't know which size I must give to the
>> canvas in order to fit the sugar Window client area (without the toolbar).
>>
>> CreateJS does that for you.
>>
>> > At last, and for that they are plenty of documentations, Javascript OOP
>> development is a bit trikier than the Python/Java OOP development
>>
>> I have the feeling that I responded this to you already, no?
>>
>> > So, how can I go further, at least with points 1) and 2) ?
>> >
>> > Regards
>> >
>> >
>> > 2014/1/24 Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com>
>> >>
>> >> Try to share the issues you have been having with web activities,
>> someone might be able to help.
>> >>
>> >> Android has probably better API and documentation then gtk, but then
>> it won't run on Sugar.
>> >>
>> >> On Friday, 24 January 2014, laurent bernabe <laurent.bernabe at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hello everyone,
>> >>>
>> >>> I've started a new Web project (ChessLearning), but it seems that Web
>> development is not my best skills. However, before turning it into a Python
>> app, I am wondering whether I should do my best to fit the Web Activity
>> development.
>> >>>
>> >>> For example, I think of an easier Android port, but am I wrong when I
>> say that it is better than Python for that ?
>> >>>
>> >>> On the other side, Python + GTK3 programming is very hard, as the
>> GTK3 library is not so easy to get used to, and Python version is not as
>> well documented as the C one (Gnome developers fault).
>> >>>
>> >>> So, I know that may be more a decision of mine, but, what do you
>> advise me ?
>> >>>
>> >>> Regards,
>> >>>
>> >>> Laurent Bernabé
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Daniel Narvaez
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Sugar-devel mailing list
>> > Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> .. manuq ..
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20140124/ce3676b5/attachment.html>