[Sugar-devel] Programming in Python or as a Web Activity ?

[laurent bernabe]

Thank you very much.

I've tried to modify what needed to be modified in my LearnChess project (
https://git.sugarlabs.org/learnchess/learnchess_web), but it seem that I
missed something. (Too hurry to get started with CreateJS :=D, sorry).

Regards


2014/1/24 Manuel Quiñones <manuq at laptop.org>

> 2014/1/24 laurent bernabe <laurent.bernabe at gmail.com>
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > The most challenging task that I am facing in my development beginning,
> is to get the libraries easel.js and tween.js work as shim dependencies of
> require.js. In fact, I think I could read require.js documentation
> thousands of times, I won't be able to get started.
>
> I have created a bootstrap activity for you:
> https://github.com/manuq/createjs-activity-bootstrap
>
> The bad thing with CreateJS is that they don't support AMD yet.  But see
>
> https://github.com/CreateJS/EaselJS/wiki/Using-easeljs-and-tweenjs-with-requirejs
> .
>  What worked for me:
>
> ./osbuild shell
> volo create my-game ./sugar-web-template
> cd my-game/lib
> wget http://code.createjs.com/easeljs-0.7.1.min.js
> mv easeljs-0.7.1.min.js easeljs.js
> wget http://code.createjs.com/tweenjs-0.5.1.min.js
> mv tweenjs-0.5.1.min.js tweenjs.js
>
> And see the changes I did:
>
> https://github.com/manuq/createjs-activity-bootstrap/commit/79f4e4ed730c71cf42bfa0419f109718fb598fcb
>
> > The other problem, is that I need to put a real canvas element inside
> the <div id="canvas"> ... but I don't know which size I must give to the
> canvas in order to fit the sugar Window client area (without the toolbar).
>
> CreateJS does that for you.
>
> > At last, and for that they are plenty of documentations, Javascript OOP
> development is a bit trikier than the Python/Java OOP development
>
> I have the feeling that I responded this to you already, no?
>
> > So, how can I go further, at least with points 1) and 2) ?
> >
> > Regards
> >
> >
> > 2014/1/24 Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com>
> >>
> >> Try to share the issues you have been having with web activities,
> someone might be able to help.
> >>
> >> Android has probably better API and documentation then gtk, but then it
> won't run on Sugar.
> >>
> >> On Friday, 24 January 2014, laurent bernabe <laurent.bernabe at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hello everyone,
> >>>
> >>> I've started a new Web project (ChessLearning), but it seems that Web
> development is not my best skills. However, before turning it into a Python
> app, I am wondering whether I should do my best to fit the Web Activity
> development.
> >>>
> >>> For example, I think of an easier Android port, but am I wrong when I
> say that it is better than Python for that ?
> >>>
> >>> On the other side, Python + GTK3 programming is very hard, as the GTK3
> library is not so easy to get used to, and Python version is not as well
> documented as the C one (Gnome developers fault).
> >>>
> >>> So, I know that may be more a decision of mine, but, what do you
> advise me ?
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>>
> >>> Laurent Bernabé
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Daniel Narvaez
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sugar-devel mailing list
> > Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
> >
>
>
>
> --
> .. manuq ..
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20140124/ef85c834/attachment.html>