[Sugar-devel] HTML Sugar: Unit testing research

Daniel Narvaez dwnarvaez at gmail.com
Tue May 21 06:53:44 EDT 2013

On 21 May 2013 01:47, Manuel Quiñones <manuq at laptop.org> wrote:

> So if we were to follow fashion, Mocha would be the one :P .  But I
> think the simplistic approach of Jasmine is good enough for us,
> specially considering the involvement of new devs.  Jasmine is a bit
> more readable and elegant too.  The only thing we should consider is
> the async support, if we can go with Jasmine one, or if we need Mocha
> one.
> http://pivotal.github.io/jasmine/#section-Asynchronous_Support

We should run into async code tests pretty soon, let's see how good/bad it
is to write them in Jasmine. If we can I'd rather stick with the simpler
framework, but async tests are probably going to be pretty important, so
this is something we need to keep an eye on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20130521/445297fb/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list