[Sugar-devel] Building on FreeBSD

Manuel Quiñones manuq at laptop.org
Tue Jun 18 22:06:14 EDT 2013


Now I see that there was another thread and you received a lot of responses.

2013/6/18 Manuel Quiñones <manuq at laptop.org>:
> Hi,
>
> I think the miss of responses to this email provoked your rant, so
> I'll try to answer:
>
> 2013/2/9 outro pessoa <outro.pessoa at gmail.com>:
>> It seems- and why not- that the system- Sugar, that is- is entirely a Linux
>> project. Is there any way possible that I could build each individual
>> module such as desktop, terminal, browser, et al and not the entire suite? I
>
> In general, not possible.  Sugar activities are a unique kind of apps
> and they relay on the services Sugar provides.  It is up to the
> developer to provide a standalone execution.  For example, Turtle
> Blocks can run in GNOME desktop.
>
> Having Terminal or Browse running outside Sugar would not be very useful.
>
>> am still working on the dependencies while asking this question. FreeBSD-
>> and the other BSDs- has is own sound server/driver and shouldn't need pulse.
>> This is my opinion and not that of the BSD community.  My experience is with
>> Makefiles and not that of python. It would still be nice to port Sugar to
>> another OS to give developers an alternative platform. The only BSD "ready
>> made" distribution is PCBSD.
>
> Sorry I don't have a clue about BSD, but I can tell you that
> separating Sugar into modules and trying to run them on FreeBSD may
> not be the correct path to follow if you want to support that system.
> A lot of work would be needed.
>
> --
> .. manuq ..



-- 
.. manuq ..


More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list