[Sugar-devel] Frequent buildbot check failures in sugar-web

[Code Raguet]

Daniel, I've sent a tiny patch for osbuild.
Can you review it, please?


On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Code Raguet <iraguet at activitycentral.com>wrote:

> Thanks, I'll sniff around that and I'll try to send a patch.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately I don't think there is a way at the moment. But you are
>> making a very good point here, should be trivial to print out the commit in
>> osbuild pull, so that it's available in the log... I'll see if I can get at
>> it or patches welcome of course... Should probably go in _pull_module
>>
>> https://github.com/dnarvaez/osbuild/blob/master/osbuild/build.py
>>
>> On Tuesday, 3 December 2013, Code Raguet wrote:
>>
>>> yesterday, before Gonzalo has fixed buildbot, I wanted to help with this
>>> and I was willing to run a "git bisect". Some submodule HEADs were broken
>>> and I needed a revision (commit SHA) of those where a build had been
>>> succesful.
>>> Looking at quick-master builder I found that build #23 was the last
>>> succesful build, but I couldn't figure out the submodule revision numbers
>>> that had been used in build #23.
>>>
>>> I'm not an expert with buildbot.
>>> How can I find out which submodule revisions have been used in a
>>> specific build?
>>>
>>> If there was a change, buildbot says the revision but not for those
>>> modules that didn't change.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Did you see the without-configuration issue in buildbot or locally? If
>>>> locally could you please post logs if you are able to repro?
>>>>
>>>> (Thanks for pointing out the other failure, will post another email)
>>>>
>>>> On Monday, 2 December 2013, Rogelio Mita wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Sometimes when check command is running, it calls karma without
>>>>> configuration file then fails, any idea why?.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyway, right now full-master fails before run "sugar-web checker" by
>>>>> two test on sugar-toolkit-gtk3: test_dist_source_out_of_source and
>>>>> test_dist_xo_out_of_source
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2013/11/28 Rogelio Mita <rogeliomita at activitycentral.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I will take note of this
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2013/11/28 Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/builders/quick-sucrose-0.100/builds/6/steps/shell_2/logs/modules
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We are getting a lot of these, like 50% of the times. Unfortunately
>>>>>>> my laptop broke so I won't be able to debug them until it comes back
>>>>>>> repaired. Help sorting this out would be appreciated, especially if you are
>>>>>>> able to reproduce the issue locally.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Daniel Narvaez
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>>>>>>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Roger
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Activity Central <http://activitycentral.com/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Roger
>>>>>
>>>>> Activity Central <http://activitycentral.com/>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Daniel Narvaez
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>>>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Narvaez
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20131206/e1bd7bda/attachment.html>