[Sugar-devel] Frequent buildbot check failures in sugar-web
Daniel Narvaez
dwnarvaez at gmail.com
Fri Dec 6 14:03:14 EST 2013
Thanks!
On 6 December 2013 18:15, Code Raguet <iraguet at activitycentral.com> wrote:
> Daniel, I've sent a tiny patch for osbuild.
> Can you review it, please?
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Code Raguet <iraguet at activitycentral.com>wrote:
>
>> Thanks, I'll sniff around that and I'll try to send a patch.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Unfortunately I don't think there is a way at the moment. But you are
>>> making a very good point here, should be trivial to print out the commit in
>>> osbuild pull, so that it's available in the log... I'll see if I can get at
>>> it or patches welcome of course... Should probably go in _pull_module
>>>
>>> https://github.com/dnarvaez/osbuild/blob/master/osbuild/build.py
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, 3 December 2013, Code Raguet wrote:
>>>
>>>> yesterday, before Gonzalo has fixed buildbot, I wanted to help with
>>>> this and I was willing to run a "git bisect". Some submodule HEADs were
>>>> broken and I needed a revision (commit SHA) of those where a build had been
>>>> succesful.
>>>> Looking at quick-master builder I found that build #23 was the last
>>>> succesful build, but I couldn't figure out the submodule revision numbers
>>>> that had been used in build #23.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not an expert with buildbot.
>>>> How can I find out which submodule revisions have been used in a
>>>> specific build?
>>>>
>>>> If there was a change, buildbot says the revision but not for those
>>>> modules that didn't change.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Did you see the without-configuration issue in buildbot or locally? If
>>>>> locally could you please post logs if you are able to repro?
>>>>>
>>>>> (Thanks for pointing out the other failure, will post another email)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Monday, 2 December 2013, Rogelio Mita wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Sometimes when check command is running, it calls karma without
>>>>>> configuration file then fails, any idea why?.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyway, right now full-master fails before run "sugar-web checker" by
>>>>>> two test on sugar-toolkit-gtk3: test_dist_source_out_of_source and
>>>>>> test_dist_xo_out_of_source
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2013/11/28 Rogelio Mita <rogeliomita at activitycentral.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I will take note of this
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2013/11/28 Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/builders/quick-sucrose-0.100/builds/6/steps/shell_2/logs/modules
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We are getting a lot of these, like 50% of the times. Unfortunately
>>>>>>>> my laptop broke so I won't be able to debug them until it comes back
>>>>>>>> repaired. Help sorting this out would be appreciated, especially if you are
>>>>>>>> able to reproduce the issue locally.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Daniel Narvaez
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>>>>>>>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>>>>>>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Roger
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Activity Central <http://activitycentral.com/>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Roger
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Activity Central <http://activitycentral.com/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Daniel Narvaez
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>>>>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>>>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daniel Narvaez
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>>
>>>
>>
>
--
Daniel Narvaez
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20131206/d31b5d61/attachment.html>
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list