[Sugar-devel] Fwd: SL bug#630

David Farning dfarning at gmail.com
Mon Sep 20 12:08:36 EDT 2010

On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Simon Schampijer <simon at schampijer.de> wrote:
> On 09/20/2010 05:50 PM, David Farning wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Simon Schampijer<simon at schampijer.de>
>>  wrote:
>>> On 09/20/2010 04:16 PM, Mukul Gupta wrote:
>>>> Copying sugar-devel on this memo
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Mukul Gupta
>>> Hi Mukul,
>>> what is the intention of this mail?
>> Mukul is describing an approach, and pros and cons, to solving a
>> problem.  Please feel free to ignore these types of questions.  As an
>> AC mentor, Alsroot will try to answer them depending on his available
>> time.
>> We, (AC and Seeta) are trying to shift all technical conversation to
>> public mailing lists for peer review rather than writing private
>> memos.
>> david
> My complaint was more about the missing guidance in the subject and the mail
> itself. If one does want feedback I encourage submitters to make it as
> digestible as possible for readers. So I think it is better to draft the
> email again for the targeted audience instead of just forwarding the mail.

In the days of yore, according to legend, there were redhat engineers
who refused to answer internal technical emails unless they were on a
public list.  It was a harsh but effective method of opening up the
organization:)  We will get there too.


More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list