[Sugar-devel] Fwd: SL bug#630

[Simon Schampijer]

On 09/20/2010 06:08 PM, David Farning wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Simon Schampijer<simon at schampijer.de>  wrote:
>> On 09/20/2010 05:50 PM, David Farning wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Simon Schampijer<simon at schampijer.de>
>>>   wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 09/20/2010 04:16 PM, Mukul Gupta wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Copying sugar-devel on this memo
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Mukul Gupta
>>>>
>>>> Hi Mukul,
>>>>
>>>> what is the intention of this mail?
>>>
>>> Mukul is describing an approach, and pros and cons, to solving a
>>> problem.  Please feel free to ignore these types of questions.  As an
>>> AC mentor, Alsroot will try to answer them depending on his available
>>> time.
>>>
>>> We, (AC and Seeta) are trying to shift all technical conversation to
>>> public mailing lists for peer review rather than writing private
>>> memos.
>>>
>>> david
>>
>> My complaint was more about the missing guidance in the subject and the mail
>> itself. If one does want feedback I encourage submitters to make it as
>> digestible as possible for readers. So I think it is better to draft the
>> email again for the targeted audience instead of just forwarding the mail.
>
> In the days of yore, according to legend, there were redhat engineers
> who refused to answer internal technical emails unless they were on a
> public list.  It was a harsh but effective method of opening up the
> organization:)  We will get there too.
>
> david

Sure, as I said, just the format was hard to parse. By me screaming I 
hope you achieve to get there sooner :)

Simon