[Sugar-devel] Policy for activities for downstream inclusion
simon at schampijer.de
Tue Sep 14 06:27:03 EDT 2010
what is the current status for activity releases in order to include
them in distributions like Soas*? Do you guys need tarballs or did you
switch over to construct the rpms from the .xo? For example the latest
Paint rpm uses the .xo AFAIK (build even the binaries from the
non-python sources in the bundle).
And is the email from ASLO enough for packagers to know about new
releases? Any other notification that packagers need?
* Of course any other downstreams that package/include activities are
happy to reply to this email too.
More information about the Sugar-devel