[Sugar-devel] Sugar and activities flag day

Daniel Drake dsd at laptop.org
Mon Sep 13 11:58:00 EDT 2010

On 10 September 2010 13:41, Daniel Drake <dsd at laptop.org> wrote:
> Just wanted to summarize an enlightening conversation that just
> happened in #sugar:

No responses..surprising!
Let me try a bit harder then.

My thoughts/suggestions:

1. Rename sugar-0.92 to Sugar-1.0

2. Switch to pygi and GTK+ 3 for sugar-1.0

3. Allow significant sugar API changes up until the sugar-1.0 API
freeze date, which I think would land mid-January 2011. These would be
subject to the usual review processes to ensure quality.

4. Ignore the silly people who draw large conclusions from looking at
a version number

5. Publicise the fact that sugar-1.0 is an API break in all activities

6. If anyone had plans or specific goals for sugar-1.0 that won't be
ready in time, push them off to sugar-2.0 (which can be released on
the original timeline that people had thought for the original

7. switch to python3 at the same time? (ok, this one wasn't discussed,
and I'm not sure of the realities, just something that crossed my


More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list