[Sugar-devel] maintenance of 0.84 branches

dfarning at sugarlabs.org dfarning at sugarlabs.org
Thu Nov 26 10:07:50 EST 2009

On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 7:43 AM, Daniel Drake <dsd at laptop.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 09:53 +0000, Daniel Drake wrote:
>> On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 09:45 +0000, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> > We'll need that they make explicit which modules want to take
>> > maintenance of and then each current maintainer should agree or
>> > disagree.
>> All of glucose, I guess. Right now we only have patches for
>> sugar-toolkit and sugar.
> Actually, we'd rather only take over maintenance where it has stopped.
> So for sugar and sugar-toolkit at least that seems necessary. If
> existing maintainers of other components are able to continue taking new
> patches (from master) and translations and publishing releases then we'd
> rather leave the job to them.
> Daniel

Awesome! Stable branch maintainers are critical to a projects success.  The respect that you and Sayamindu have earned with _both_ the core developers and deployments makes you outstanding for this task.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 271 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20091126/818eaacb/attachment.pgp 

More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list