[Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Future of Zero Sugar
tomeu at sugarlabs.org
Tue Dec 15 09:23:06 EST 2009
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:19, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de> wrote:
> On 15.12.2009, at 15:09, Daniel Drake wrote:
>> I believe there are still various well-known 0.86 regressions (over
>> 0.84). For example, Record not working. These regressions are going to
>> be a huge headache to anyone who tries to upgrade, perhaps you could
>> squash a few of those.
> Speaking of upgrade headaches, the most significant UI change in 0.84 is resume-by-default, which combined with the still not implemented versioning is possibly unhealthy in deployments. I can see many Journal entries overwritten for good. Has there been any experience with kids used to the 0.82 way who switched to a later Sugar version? And if needed, would it be easy for deployments to revert to not resuming by default?
Good point, reverting would be easy and also adding a setting to
switch it on or off. I can work on it if someone takes the task of
verifying the need.
«Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar.
What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» - David
More information about the Sugar-devel