[Sugar-devel] clash of user- and system-installed activities (was: Release Physics-3)
Gary C Martin
gary at garycmartin.com
Fri Aug 28 17:15:09 EDT 2009
On 28 Aug 2009, at 21:42, Walter Bender wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Jonas Smedegaard<dr at jones.dk> wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 02:15:29PM +0100, Gary C Martin wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Dave,
>>>
>>> Do you have Physics-2 installed on the SoaS? Depending on the SoaS
>>> version you have, the early ones had Activities installed in non-
>>> standard places, with non user permissions, and sometimes symbolic
>>> links :-( You would need to drop down into terminal, find and remove
>>> that Physics.activity folder. Then the normal install process should
>>> work as normal.
>>>
>>> FWIW: On old SoaS, my first task would be to drop into the Terminal
>>> and clean this all up manually, so that all the *.activity
>>> directories
>>> were migrated the expected ~/Activities, and ownership permissions
>>> of
>>> them given back to the user (recursive chown on ~/Activities). In
>>> the
>>> current SoaS activities are installed from their .xo bundles so this
>>> is no longer an issue :-)
>>
>> Is this an issue specific to SoaS and/or Physics, or generally a
>> limitation
>> of current Sugar that older system-installed Activities disturb newer
>> user-installed ones?
>>
>> (or did I get it wrong that that was the actual issue here?)
>>
>
> I think you got it right.
>
> -walter
Dave reported (off-list) that a manual deletion of v2, reboot, and
then install of v3 worked fine. My radar was going off regarding the
addition of MIME support, as I have a few hairs standing up on the
back of my neck about how Sugar deals with that step. Almost no
activities except pre-installed Fructose have exercised this code path
much, sugar-install-bundle was doing odd things as I was having to
reboot for the activity to show up, so I assume it was silently
borking some place, but installing an .xo via Journal (equiv. Browse
download) was running just fine.
Regards,
--Gary
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list