[Sugar-devel] Results of today's Jabber Testing

David Farning dfarning at sugarlabs.org
Wed Aug 12 09:31:56 EDT 2009


Thanks for the advice.

We will be going to do some more tests this morning.  I think we will
spend a while learning about the tools which you and martin mentioned
then run another debug session.

david

On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:00 AM, Dave Bauer<dave at solutiongrove.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:33 PM, Caroline
>> Meeks<caroline at solutiongrove.com> wrote:
>> > I worked with the RIT contingent and Dave Farning today to do some
>> > collaboration testing.
>> > We tested with 8 computers on a rarely used dev XS system hosted by
>> > Solution
>> > Grove.
>>
>> Interesting!
>>
>> Your report is a bit confusing so I will
>>
>>  - you had no problems connecting 8 users to a vanilla XS running some
>> 0.6d, right?
>>  - but later on jabber.s.o you had problems with 29 users...
>>
>> Is that correct?
>>
>> What sw is jabber.s.o running? Does it deviate in any way from a
>> recent XS 0.6? Could network problems explain part of the problem?
>
> jabber.sl.o is XS 0.5.2 stock install. It has 2GB of ram. Both xsdev and
> jabber.sl.o are virtual machines on the same network in the same rack.
>>
>> What did ejabberdctl connected-users say at the points when users were
>> appearing/disappearing? Did ejabberd see them come and go? Or did it
>> think they were connected all the time?
>
> connected-users reported the correct number, so when they were disconnecting
> and connectng, it was changing the reported number of connected-users.
>>
>> These are very basic questions -- when doing this testing, you'll want
>> someone looking at the jabber server, dumping connected-users and
>> asking the Sugar users to run `olpc-xos` to compare.
>
>
> We were using the Analyze activity to compare. On the 0.6 server it matched.
> I was watching the server and Analyze at te same time.
>>
>> In fact a time-series of captures of `olpc-xos` on each Sugar / XO
>> client and  `ejabberd connected-users` on the XS, plus a verbose log
>> from ejabberd would tell you a lot.
>
> olpc-xos command is not installed on SoaS. Maybe we can add that. Using
> analyze we can see the real-time connection but I don't see any way to
> capture the data historically.
>
> Dave
>>
>> cheers,
>>
>>
>>
>> m
>> --
>>  martin.langhoff at gmail.com
>>  martin at laptop.org -- School Server Architect
>>  - ask interesting questions
>>  - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
>>  - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Bauer
> dave at solutiongrove.com
> http://www.solutiongrove.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>


More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list