[sugar] Sugar Python environment
Marco Pesenti Gritti
mpg
Wed Sep 27 17:39:18 EDT 2006
Ian Bicking wrote:
> I'm thinking that the Sugar jhbuild should probably use
> virtual-python.py: http://peak.telecommunity.com/dist/virtual-python.py
>
> Alternately (and particularly if OLPC goes to Python 2.5), Python
> should be built as part of the build process. virtual-python
> basically symlinks Python so it doesn't pick anything up from the
> global installation. It's like building a custom Python, but faster
> since it doesn't actually build anything.
>
I tend to think we should build our own python. The 2.5 migration will
happen at some point and we can't rely on distribution shipping the
python version we want.
sugar-jhbuild can build python already. The problem is that we still
depend on some system installed bindings. dbus and avahi that I can
think of. Both runs a system daemon, so I'm not sure about the best way
to deal with them.
> Then instead of relying on $PYTHONPATH to control the environment,
> using build/bin/python will use the custom environment. (And of
> course, having that directory first on $PATH will make "python" work
> as well.)
>
> Would building 100% of the OLPC software be prohibitive (either to
> build the software, or setup the build process)? That would then give
> us a completely accurate system and process.
>
I guess it depends on what you mean with 100% of the software. There are
packages that needs to be provided by the system (the dbus system
server for example) and packages that are probably not interesting to
build (libjpeg for example). We need to draw a line. I think current
jhbuild + python would a pretty good line.
Marco
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list