[IAEP] Resubmission of Proposed Project for Sugarizer1°
lionel.laske at gmail.com
Fri Mar 3 07:45:55 EST 2017
I'm fully encourage your proposal.
Sugarizer is not my tool, or the tool of OLPC France. Everyone should be
able to appropriate Sugarizer itself and transform/adapt it for its needs.
That's the way Open Source Software works and Sugarizer definitively lack
of tester feedbacks. So welcome Sugarizer 1° !
I will support it technically as far as I could.
2017-03-02 23:11 GMT+01:00 Caryl Bigenho <cbigenho at hotmail.com>:
> Hi All...
> This proposal can be improved a lot. However, I am re-submitting it
> mainly as an example of the kinds of things I feel SugarLabs should be
> supporting with their precious funds. I originally submitted it last
> Because of the SoCalifLinuxExpo and a house full of people, I don't have
> the opportunity to make revisions at this moment. Things I can see it needs
> are a definite timeline, a clearly thought out budget, and names of some of
> the people who would be involved. I would love to have additional
> suggestions for things to add and volunteers to assist in getting it into
> better shape by the next SLOB meeting.
> At this point, I do not expect approval, but rather encouragement to
> expand and refine this early proposal, along with suggestions in time for
> the next SLOB meeting.
> I invite others (Samson???) to also submit rough drafts of proposals as
> samples of the kinds of things SugarLabs could be doing.
> The SLOB meeting tomorrow is at 11 AM PST. The Expo Hall at SCaLE15X
> opens at 10 AM. Because of that it will be difficult for me, Adam, and
> other SL members to give our full attention to the meeting. We will do the
> best we can under the circumstances.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the IAEP