[IAEP] [SLOBS] Motions to create position of Translation-Community Manager

[Laura Vargas]

Tony,

What would be in place to explain, is why atfer the creation of the
position (first motion) SLOBs are not openly requiring proposals from all
community members and /or any interested party that might be adequate or
experienced to execute the required functions.

In my opinion public email in IAEP + localization list + 15 -30 days to get
proposals, should be enough to be called an "open call".

Best regards,

Laura

2016-04-06 22:44 GMT+08:00 Walter Bender <walter.bender at gmail.com>:

>
>
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Dave Crossland <dave at lab6.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 6 April 2016 at 09:42, Walter Bender <walter.bender at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> the traffic on the list is close to nil
>>
>>
>> Does the traffic include deliberation of motions? :)
>>
>
> Never intentionally. When it does happen, we try to catch the mistake,
> such as Adam reminding Tony to circulate his motion publicly,
>
> Also, in answer to an earlier question, yes, the ombudsman is a member of
> the list.
>
> -walter
>
> -walter
>
> -walter
>
>
>
> --
> Walter Bender
> Sugar Labs
> http://www.sugarlabs.org
> <http://www.sugarlabs.org>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>



-- 
Laura V.
I&D SomosAZUCAR.Org

Identi.ca/Skype acaire
IRC kaametza

Happy Learning!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/attachments/20160406/af988af2/attachment-0001.html>