[IAEP] Contents of IAEP Digest, Vol 18, Issue 78
tomeu at sugarlabs.org
Mon Sep 21 04:23:31 EDT 2009
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 06:49, Tabitha Roder <tabitha at hrdnz.com> wrote:
>> Anyway, as a muggle or someone with little information (a.k.a. the
>> public) I actually thought, could say was sure, eve, that Sugarlabs was
>> pushing SOaS as their flagship product, maybe SugarLive was there around
>> somewhere, or course (?!?!) Sugar for the XO, whose status seems so
>> unclear... Being "better informed that most" I knew that SOaS ran on
>> top of Fedora, like the XO Sugar did, so no surprises, but that's it
>> AFAIK. I was glad people kept an eye on Ubuntu (my distro of choice),
>> and there's been some enthusiasm around Xtra something going on last
>> week in OLPCNews, and SD card based distro.
> For what its worth, I thought Sugarlabs were using Sugar on a Stick as
> an entry tool to introduce people to Sugar before deploying Fedora
> with Sugar as the operating system and GUI of choice for schools. I
> assume that Sugarlabs are still making this possible for XO hardware
> as well as other hardware that schools can get their hands on.
I think we have consensus on SLs promoting packaging of Sugar on any
distro, so interested admins can do a Sugar installation in the same
way they would be doing a GNOME or KDE one.
By having Sugar packaged in several distros, we have made a big step
forward in having live images based on each of those distros.
>>> So, a possible solution could be calling the product marketed by SLs
>>> "Sugar on a Stick" and each individual team and product "Fedora Sugar
>>> on a Stick", "OpenSUSE Sugar on a Stick", etc. From time to time SLs
>>> would decide to call and market as "Sugar on a Stick" a particular
>>> release of a particular flavor. This decision process should be very
>>> transparent and fair, of course.
> IMHO, It is confusing to non geeks when you everything has strange
> names that dont make sense to them. Can we say Sugar on a Stick to
> public (and that is always the SoaS that sugarlabs thinks is the
> safest for public consumption) with a flavour tacked for techie
That's what I was trying to say, SLs would only market "Sugar on a Stick".
> Incremental seems logical for those lucky enough to learn
> maths, so can I suggest we tag numbers on. E.g. "Sugar on a Stick -
> Strawberry 1.01" could be code for the SoaS that is Fedora based and
> is release 1.01 and the next SoaS that is Fedora based be Strawberry
> 1.02. Ubuntu versions would be Vanilla 1.01 and OpenSUSE versions
> would be Lime 1.01 or something. That takes only one page on the
> sugarlabs wiki to check what you actually have and means end users
> just see minimal information = Sugar on a Stick.
That's also a possibility, would be good to hear opinions from the distro teams.
>>>> register SOaSFedora.org and such others
> IMHO, Also easier for end user if there are only a few sites to look
> at not many. We point everyone to laptop.org and sugarlabs.org - we
> can tell people that information here is most likely to be accurate.
> If it is spread over many sites they might miss finding accurate and
> current information. Redirects could be useful though. One page
> websites that give basics and then point to the correct sugarlabs page
Sounds good to me, because people will search for us using very
different terms, more as new projects appear inside SLs.
«Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar.
What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» - David
More information about the IAEP