[IAEP] [Sugar-devel] project policy consensus

Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero rafael at sugarlabs.org
Tue Sep 1 19:38:21 EDT 2009

The policy is ok to me also.

Rafael Ortiz

On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Aleksey Lim<alsroot at member.fsf.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 12:44:48PM -0500, David Farning wrote:
>> At the end of last week I posted a draft project policy[1] on the
>> mailing list.  It has not received any public or private criticism.
>> Unless I hear otherwise, I'll post it to the wiki tomorrow with a
>> 'draft' tag.
>> david
>> 1. http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-August/007993.html
> +1
> In my mind it correlates with proposing ideas to Engineering
> Committee(since there wasn't clear consensus in ml thread for example)
> or more, it makes redundant existing of Engineering Committee in most
> cases. I mean that if there is agreement about mission statement of
> proposed feature(i.e. w/o any technical details of implementation) it
> will be much easier to find consensus with particular implementation.
> So, I'm waiting for final wiki page which I could use to formalize
> a couple of ideas for 0.88 release cycle.
> --
> Aleksey
> _______________________________________________
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

More information about the IAEP mailing list