[IAEP] Getting the message out - take2
morgan.collett at gmail.com
Mon Jan 19 06:15:48 EST 2009
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 22:06, Bernie Innocenti <bernie at codewiz.org> wrote:
> [cc += iaep@]
> Here's a revised version integrating some feedback from marketing@:
> Does the world know that Sugar Labs is still 100% committed to support
> We got nearly zero press coverage lately, and the only message that
> everybody got is that OLPC ditched the development of Sugar, and the
> general mood is pretty negative.
> Perhaps we should be much louder in telling people about a few facts
> that would sound surprising outside our small circle and even within it:
> - Sugar's development infrastructure is now mostly independent of
> OLPC, thanks to many generous partners (Ivan, OSL, Free Software
> Foundation, prgmr.com, MIT Media Lab, Solution Groove, Collabora
> and Develer);
Solution Grove, not Solution Groove.
> - For about 3 months now, Sugar Labs has already been taking
> care of Sugar development with almost no support from OLPC;
(except for contracting developers until recently.)
> - Sugar has not lost any of its full-time core developers as a
> consequence of OLPC's layoffs.
> - All of the core team will stay around as unpaid volunteers
> while we're looking for new ways to finance their full-time
> - Today, development of Sugar and activities relies upon 20 active
> contributors (we actually have 30 user accounts on sunjammer,
> but some of them don't count as contributors of any kind);
Perhaps a note about there being many Sugar activities originally
developed for the XO - which, while not actively maintained, are a
good starting point for further activity development.
> - Over the past few months, we have grown our community with new
> contributors, new partners and new distributors;
> - The rate of development seems to be increasing steadily as we
> consolidate our new community driven development model
> (we can obtain some support evidence from git);
> - Through the SFC, Sugar Labs is receiving some very generous
> support (although we're not yet able to credit individual
> - While we do not plan to hire a development team within Sugar Labs,
> we're working to get some of our full-time volunteer contributors
> sponsored by external organizations;
> - Red Hat and Solutions Groove are contributing with engineering
> resources and covering traveling expenses for some of our members;
Solution Grove, not Solutions Groove.
> - The development cycle is proceeding steadily and 0.84 will be
> released as planned in March;
> - We've been working to establish Local Labs, grassroots
> organizations which, in our mind, will fill up the gap left by
> OLPC in deployments;
> It's starting to become clear that 0.84 is where we'll prove our
> credibility as a self-sufficient, community-driven project.
> To the best of my knowledge, all the above corresponds to reality.
> Can anyone spot any factual mistake I should correct, or things
> we'd better avoid saying? Am I being exaggeratedly positive
> Anyone who has contacts with local or international press agencies is
> invited to help us deliver this message effectively.
should hit Planet Ubuntu shortly.
More information about the IAEP