[IAEP] http://www-testing.sugarlabs.org/
,Josh williams
joshcwilliams at gmail.com
Fri Feb 27 14:32:59 EST 2009
Hi Nate,
I agree with you completely, actually I'd have to say that you're
preaching to the choir; I'm a huge fan of Helvetica. I've been meaning
to check that film out. I've heard mixed reviews, but I think it's
something I'd enjoy.
I just think embedding a clone to replace a clone is overkill.
Cheers,
Josh
Nate Ridderman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 1:54 PM, ,Josh williams
> <joshcwilliams at gmail.com <mailto:joshcwilliams at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> In my experience, most fonts in Windows look bad anyway. I don't think
> it would be worth the effort embed a helvetica clone, arial is
> already a
> clone of helvetica. However, when firefox 3.1 comes out embedding
> fonts
> is something to consider. There's an outstanding article on the
> subject
> here
> http://jontangerine.com/log/2008/10/font-face-in-ie-making-web-fonts-work
> .
>
> Josh
>
>
> Arial is a bastard step-child of Helvetica. It's not nearly as good in
> my opinion. If you have a chance to watch the documentary on Helvetica
> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helvetica_%28film%29>, I highly
> recommend it. It touches on this subject, but is very interesting in
> general.
>
> Thanks for the link. I didn't realize the state of embedding fonts was
> as complex as this. I plan to read more and see if there is a workable
> solution or combination of solutions.
>
> Nate
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
More information about the IAEP
mailing list