[IAEP] [SLOBS] Governance.
dfarning at sugarlabs.org
Sun Feb 1 20:54:04 EST 2009
I take full responsibility for starting the thread Mike is upset
about. _Every_ action I make as part of Sugar Labs involves four
1. Seek opinions of people I trust about the topic at hand.
2. Public summarize what I have learned on IAEP.
3. Wait for a consensus to form.
4. Take action.
This issues is no different then any other. I have talked to people
from deployments, people from distributions, OEMs, VARs, and other
developers. I am working on the summary to propose to on iaep for
If I am wrong, please prove me wrong by implementing a better
solution. I would much rather Sugar Labs have a working solution...
and I am wrong yet again.
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Ivan Krstić
<krstic at solarsail.hcs.harvard.edu> wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2009, at 8:14 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
>> Why don't we appoint you as a monitor of the slobs list.
> As I understand it, the thread in question wasn't ever *on* the list,
> but was carried out through private CC. We set up the slobs@ list
> precisely to avoid e-mails going through private CC, which obviously
> escape all transparency mechanisms that are in place; why did this
> thread not take place on the list?
> Ivan Krstić <krstic at solarsail.hcs.harvard.edu> | http://radian.org
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP at lists.sugarlabs.org
More information about the IAEP