[IAEP] Alpha API Docs are up.

Marco Pesenti Gritti mpg at redhat.com
Mon Jun 9 01:18:14 CEST 2008

Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 6:57 PM, Ivan Krstić
> <krstic at solarsail.hcs.harvard.edu> wrote:
>> On Jun 8, 2008, at 8:32 PM, David Farning wrote:
>>> In my self assumed role of community advocate;), I would like to ask
>>> what do you mean by 'internal'?
>> Internal in the sense "should not have consumers outside of the Sugar
>> codebase and hence should not necessarily have a documented public API", not
>> internal in the sense of "secret".
> Yes, those internal classes should have pydocs just like the public
> api does, but IMO they are more useful when reading the actual code
> while hacking the shell, etc.
> I'm not against publishing those to html, but should be made very
> clear which classes are public API and which are not.

Yeah. We could publish them as two separate groups. The shell docs 
(sugar module) might be good to have somewhere as well, but definately 
not mixed with the public API.


More information about the Its.an.education.project mailing list