[IAEP] Sugar Labs web services conventions

[David Farning]

Over the last couple of weeks Sugar Labs has brought several web
services online.

What would be a good naming convention for the git repositories for
these services?  I have been using SERVICENAME.sugarlabs.org.  Now, I
think that sl.o-SERVICENAME makes more sense.  It is easier to search
for web service related repositories that way.  Any thoughts before I
start making the changes.

thanks
david

PS. If you get a chance, thank Bernie and the rest of the
Infrastructure Team.  Sunjammer gives Sugar Labs a lot of fexability
to set-up, test, and put new services into productions!