[Bugs] #694 URGE: xulrunner: security update
SugarLabs Bugs
bugtracker-noreply at sugarlabs.org
Wed Apr 8 15:21:33 EDT 2009
#694: xulrunner: security update
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Reporter: sascha_silbe | Owner: sascha_silbe
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: Urgent | Milestone: Unspecified by Release Team
Component: sugar-jhbuild | Version: Git as of bugdate
Severity: Critical | Resolution:
Keywords: | Distribution: Unspecified
Status_field: Assigned |
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Comment(by sascha_silbe):
> Should we move to 1.9.1 now that most distros are using it?
I'm unsure about that. We'd loose support for Ubuntu intrepid (which still
has support at least up to 2010.04) and Fedora 10 (don't know anything
about Fedora support periods) - or at least would require people trying to
get Sugar 0.86 running on those distros to backport latest xulrunner.
Debian lenny (just released!) already isn't good enough due to dependency
on gio.
OTOH, given that xulrunner is supported rather shortly upstream, depending
on old versions might not be a good idea either.
> Also, do we need to worry about security in jhbuild? Given that it is a
development tool.
Especially in that case. Think of what happens if a developer machine gets
taken over (we still have no Rainbow in place that would prevent that)!
--
Ticket URL: <http://dev.sugarlabs.org/ticket/694#comment:2>
Sugar Labs <http://sugarlabs.org/>
Sugar Labs bug tracking system
More information about the Bugs
mailing list