[Sugar-devel] About Flatpak porting

[ayushman khurana]

thanks for clarification.
and one more question, after doing the port, how to publish the port to
flathub?


On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 5:55 PM Martin Abente <
martin.abente.lahaye at gmail.com> wrote:

> If you goal is to make Activities run as Flatpak (independently of Sugar
> services) then you must do the port.
>
> The port complexity varies depending on how many of these services are
> used (and how big the dependency is). Best case scenario the port is just a
> 1 liner, worst case, it requires other adaptations.
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 9:09 AM ayushman khurana <
> khuranaayushman999 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> hi this is ayushman,
>> i have been reading about flatpak porting using sugarapp.
>> I want to ask if the porting is to be done for all the sugar apps or only
>> those which needs to perform tasks like saving or retrieving data to and
>> from journal .
>>
>> thanks.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20200310/12650055/attachment.htm>