[Sugar-devel] why cannot most of sugar apps be packaged as flatpacks?
satellitgo at gmail.com
Mon Nov 25 10:45:25 EST 2019
On 11/25/19 5:40 AM, Martin Abente wrote:
> Hello Thomas,
> I am actually working on packaging sugar apps with flatpak, and
> publushing them in Flathub. See
> The work goes beyond just packaging, but also doing some porting so
> the experience is properly integrated into the desktop paradigm.
> I still just getting started, but I am getting ready to have some GCI
> tasks as well.
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 10:35 AM Thomas Gilliard <satellitgo at gmail.com
> <mailto:satellitgo at gmail.com>> wrote:
> <satellit> this is silverblue f32 1119 has Turtleblocks 220 etoys and
> labyrinth 0.6 as flatpacks
> <satellit> why cannot most of sugar apps be packaged as flatpacks?
> Google tasks? walterbender?
> <satellit> https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Fedora_32#Silverblue
> <satellit> using system 76 laptop with it installed
> <satellit> #flatpack #silverblue
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> <mailto:Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org>
Let me know if I can help in testing. I do not program : ( .
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Sugar-devel