[Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] meeting reminder
laura at somosazucar.org
Fri Dec 2 18:45:25 EST 2016
I'm really sad you are not directing the committee's time table and
activities, like last year. We should all thank you for your hard work.
I'm also sorry you had no time to move forward with the funding activities,
you promoted early this year.
I agree and I hope everyone (every year) has the opportunity to run for the
board and this requires promotion from the committee. *What I don't
understand is why it wasn't made (or delegated) on time? this should have
been done in September-October and November, don't you agree?*
Regards and blessings,
2016-12-02 17:38 GMT-05:00 Caryl Bigenho <cbigenho at hotmail.com>:
> Sebastian wrote, "That is a statement that shouldn't be done lightly. It
> casts doubt on
> the process you yourself led last year."
> As you well know we (you, Samson, and I) sent out multiple emails to make
> very sure everyone had an opportunity not only to vote but also to run for
> office, if they so chose. It was a lot of work and we had many hours
> involved in making it happen. I Have seen nothing like that happening this
> *From:* Sebastian Silva <sebastian at fuentelibre.org>
> *Sent:* Friday, December 2, 2016 10:56:43 AM
> *To:* Caryl Bigenho; Laura Vargas; Dave Crossland; Tony Anderson; José
> Miguel García; Claudia Ur
> *Cc:* SLOBs; iaep; Sugar-dev Devel; OLPC para usuarios, docentes,
> voluntarios y administradores
> *Subject:* Re: [IAEP] [SLOBS] [SLOB] meeting reminder
> On 02/12/16 12:36, Caryl Bigenho wrote:
> > I don't know who is in charge,
> Last time, you were in charge of the election.
> > but they should have made sure they sent several reminders of
> > deadlines to file for candidacy. In fact, was there ever an
> > announcement sent out to all of the membership asking if they wish to
> > run and giving deadlines and a timeline?
> Are you being ironic? There obviously wasn't any.
> > I didn't see even one. This has always been done in the past. It looks
> > like someone is trying to rig the election!
> That is a statement that shouldn't be done lightly. It casts doubt on
> the process you yourself led last year.
> I don't plan to volunteer this year. This has been made clear in prior
> conversation but I thought it would be worth to state it publicly again.
> Dave already gave an update on the current status.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Sugar-devel