[Sugar-devel] service_name and bundle_id... again

[Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn]

>But anyway we have the problem of all the activities not available in aslo.
Wich activities are not in aslo??

Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:02:25 -0200
Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] service_name and bundle_id... again
From: gonzalo at laptop.org
To: alanjas at hotmail.com
CC: manuq at laptop.org; dwnarvaez at gmail.com; sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org

Gonzalo: you have the list of activities that need be fixed?

I have a list, but need do it again, because the process I used to 
get the last version from aslo is wrong.
But anyway we have the problem of all the activities not available in aslo.
Gonzalo

 

Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 15:41:56 -0200
From: gonzalo at laptop.org

To: manuq at laptop.org
CC: dwnarvaez at gmail.com; sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org

Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] service_name and bundle_id... again


Oh, good Gonzalo, this is the bug to solve then.  Your patch is in the



correct direction, but allows GTK3 activities to use service_name,

which I don't think is correct.  The fix should allow only GTK2

activities to use service_name, and log a deprecation warning message,

as you did.



I don't see your point. 
Look at the code. activitybundle.py do not have logic to recognize gtk2 or gtk3activities. The patch is simple, why look for a more complicate logic,

only to avoid new activities using service_name instead of bundle_id?
We have a problem with old activities stopping working, not with new activities. 
Gonzalo


 
Thanks,



--

.. manuq ..




_______________________________________________
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel 		 	   		  

 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20131030/6ce015ba/attachment.html>