[Sugar-devel] Web activity example that uses html5 canvas

[Manuel Quiñones]

Excellent Gary, thanks a lot.

If you can describe the bugs or add tickets, I'll be happy to help.

2013/5/11 Gary Martin <garycmartin at googlemail.com>:
> Hey Manuel,
>
> On 11 May 2013, at 00:47, Manuel Quiñones <manuq at laptop.org> wrote:
>
>> Oh, we should release it then.  Can you, Gary?
>
> Yes but need to fix the 'drag hands' bugs – can't have it reading out occasional incorrect times to kids due to lack of precision/rounding errors ;) Lets see if I can make progress this weekend and make a release.
>
> Regards,
> --Gary
>
>> 2013/5/10 James Cameron <quozl at laptop.org>:
>>> On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 10:55:51AM +1000, James Cameron wrote:
>>>> Summary: this Clock activity consumes significantly less CPU on XO-4
>>>> and XO-1 when implemented in Javascript.
>>>
>>> Myth busted.  See new results in context below.
>>>
>>>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 08:42:18PM -0300, Manuel Qui?ones wrote:
>>>>> 2013/4/30 James Cameron <quozl at laptop.org>:
>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 08:58:50AM -0300, Manuel Qui?ones wrote:
>>>>>>> Should work on other browsers now:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://manuq.github.io/clockjs/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Agreed, works well, reasonably low CPU utilisation.  Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Excellent.  Thanks for checking the CPU consumption.
>>>>
>>>> Here's a more detailed check.  Method is to run only the activity
>>>> under test, and use the serial port to run the Linux top command
>>>> configured for a 30 second sample time.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> On XO-4 using 13.1.0:
>>>>
>>>> - using Javascript, the Browse-149 process consumes 7.5% CPU, and the
>>>>  X process 3.2% CPU.  Total of 10.7% CPU.
>>>>
>>>> - not using Javascript, the Clock-12 process consumes 2.7% CPU, and
>>>>  the X process 13.2% CPU.  Total of 15.9% CPU.
>>>
>>> Clock-12.5 process consumes 0.6%, and the X process 2.0%, a total of
>>> 2.6%.
>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> On XO-1 using 13.2.0, build 32004o0,
>>>>
>>>> - using Javascript, the Browse-149.2 process consumes 9.8%, the X
>>>>  process 7.4%, a total of 17.2%,
>>>>
>>>> - not using Javascript, the Clock-12 process consumes 10.4% and X
>>>>  process consumes 18.4%, a total of 30.8%.
>>>
>>> Clock-12.5 process consumes 1.5%, and the X process 3.6%, a total of
>>> 5.1%.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> On XO-1 using 11.3.0, build 883,
>>>>
>>>> - using Javascript, the Browse 129.1 does not render the script,
>>>>
>>>> - not using Javascript, the Clock-6 consumes 7.0%, and X consumed
>>>>  9.0%, a total of 16%.
>>>
>>> Test not repeated.
>>>
>>> --
>>> James Cameron
>>> http://quozl.linux.org.au/
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> .. manuq ..
>



-- 
.. manuq ..